Next.js framework, developed by Vercel, is the most popular framework used for building fast and cutting-edge web development work. Next.js offers different features such as server-side rendering, static site generation, seo friendly website development, and simple integration with React, allowing developers to develop highly performable web development works. Next.js simplifies the web development process by managing tools and configurations, and Next.js is not considered a coding language; it is named a framework and developed on top of React and JavaScript.
But several web developers now find some issues occurring with Next.js when doing web development. This is really heartbreaking for the React developers who have preferred Next.js for their website development solutions with several SEO benefits and a better experience for developers. Next.js is beneficial for building certain websites, and at the same time, it can be a bad choice for some other reasons as well.
So, here let's see the reasons why this is happening and why professional web development company is moving from Next.js.
1. Complexity and Learning Difficulties:
One of the major reasons for moving from Next.js is the complexity and learning difficulty. Here, this means it is hard to understand this framework like Next.js, and it should be more difficult for a person who doesn't have more experience in this web development field. In Next.js, there are several features available that might be complicated for the beginner. Mainly, two features, such as server-side rendering and static site generation, might create frustration and confusion between beginners and developers who are familiar with simpler tools. For learning, this may require more time and effort to become familiar with the featured concepts implemented by this framework. This is because many of the web development companies moved from Next.js to another one.
2. Poor performance:
User experience, conversions, SEO, and everything depend on the website's performance. Even when Next.js is popular for its fast performance, it now takes 200- 400ms for rendering a page. If it is a complex and dynamic page, more than 700ms is taken. The website may not be able to handle too many crawlers getting into the website frequently. Its SEO performance, which was the notable benefit, has been decreased by half. Slow server-side rendering results in losing rankings and gets penalized for slow speed.
3. Flexibility and Limitations
The next important reason is about flexibility and limitations. While working on Next.js, these frameworks provide different kinds of rules and structures that don't work on all projects. This can be named as the limitation faced by Next.js. These frameworks provide several automatic features that make developers' work simpler; some developers may think that using these automatic features tries to limit them and they don't have the entire control over their work. Some web developers and companies need to explore their work and need complete freedom to customize the project according to their own ideas.
4. Cost and Resource to be considered
Cost and resources to be considered while developing a project. This means how much money and effort are to be considered while building a project by using Next.js. As mentioned above, Next.js is a popular framework that provides different automatic features and others. But all this requires resources. The different functions like a server that can manage server-side rendering or continuous redevelopment of static pages. This high cost can be charged for hosting and performing the developed projects.
Choosing Next.js or leaving it entirely depends on what kind of website you are about to develop and considering the needs or problems faced. It is fine for any dynamic or e-commerce websites. For building an SEO-friendly website with dynamic content and for complex authenticated experiences, Next.js can be a good choice. But it is better to move if you are building a single-page or small website, as it complicates during the development stage.
Nothing is constant. Something that works well today doesnt mean it will work the same for the whole time. New changes take place in tech, and adapting to the changes and making the right decisions results in better outcomes. Many web development companies move from Next.js due to its increase in complexity, and when a better alternative choice is there.
In conclusion, Next.js is a powerful framework for React-based development. In simple terms, it's clear that it does not fit for every business. Nowadays, we can see that some companies are moving from Next.js due to several reasons. That reason includes high cost and resources required for maintaining the works, limited flexibility, poor performance issues, and complexity in learning. All the time, the best choice for work depends on the requirements of companies.
